Fractional Chief AI Officer
We build AI agents into the work your company actually does. The reporting, the research, the intake, the follow-up. The hours your people spend on repeatable work come back as capacity. Same headcount, more revenue per employee.
Nothing is on fire. That's what makes it expensive. Your best people spend their weeks assembling the same reports, chasing the same follow-ups and re-answering the same questions. The work gets done, it just costs a salary every time.
More revenue means more people, which means more managers, which means more overhead. Your revenue per employee has been flat for three years and nobody has said it out loud.
Everything real routes through you. Not because your team isn’t good, but because their week is already spoken for.
Licenses got issued. Some people write email faster. Nothing structural moved. MIT’s 2025 study of enterprise AI put a number on how common this is: 95% of enterprise GenAI pilots produced no measurable P&L impact.
Not a consultant who hands you a deck. A senior operator who designs the strategy, builds the systems and stays accountable for what they return.
A 12-month plan tied to revenue, margin or capacity, with every workflow ranked by what automating it is worth in dollars. You find out what is worth doing before anyone builds anything.
Agents built for your actual workflows in sales, ops, support, research and internal knowledge. Deployed on infrastructure you control, not rented from a generic SaaS box.
Agents are built so the model underneath is a swappable part. We change it when a better or cheaper one lands, often automatically per job, so you get the right model for the task instead of whichever one you signed with.
Agents run in your own environment or a dedicated tenant, never pooled with another client's. We don’t train on your data, and the deployment is designed to survive your customer’s security questionnaire.
We don’t keep the keys. The agents, prompts, evals and runbooks are yours, they run in your environment, and nothing about them is welded to us or to a single vendor. Your team learns to run and extend the lot.
Quarterly AI-impact reviews with metrics, costs, risks and the next 90 days, written for executives rather than engineers. Every agent carries unit economics in dollars.
This is the part your team stops doing
Three blockers, two I’d negotiate rather than fight. The subprocessor clause is the one that will actually fail the audit.
Illustrative run. Real agents are built against your systems, your data and your standards.
Pick the seat you sit in. These are the six jobs most likely eating that seat's week right now, and the agent that would take each one over.
You run a company between $5M and $100M, and you are the bottleneck on anything that needs judgement.
What eats the week now → the agent that takes it over
Every one of these is a real agent your Chief AI Officer designs, builds, and stays accountable for. This is not a feature list.
Get your Leverage Score →Predictable phases and a real artifact every month. You will know by day 30 whether the numbers justify going further.
Workflow audit, data inventory, AI roadmap with prioritized use cases and a clear ROI model.
Highest-leverage agent designed, built, and deployed into your stack with team training.
Additional agents, evaluation framework, internal enablement, vendor decisions, governance.
Hand-off to your team, hiring plan for full-time AI roles if you need them, board reporting cadence.
It usually isn't the technology. It's how the engagement was built.
| Dimension | Most AI consultancies | Chief Of Life |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | A six-month strategy phase that ends in a PDF | A working agent in 90 days |
| Ownership | Junior associates do the work; partners take the credit | One senior operator owns it end to end |
| Lock-in | Built on the platform they resell, and it moves with them | Model-agnostic and portable: swap vendors without a rebuild |
| Commercials | $1M+ engagements on multi-year SOWs | A retainer, month-to-month, no long contract |
| Handoff | Handed to a “delivery team” you have never met | Your team’s fluency is a contractual deliverable |
Find out what the leverage is worth, hand the whole program to a senior operator, or just buy back your own week. Most people start in the middle.
30 days · credited in full against your first month if you continue
We map where your hours and dollars actually go, then rank every workflow by what automating it is worth. You leave with the roadmap whether or not you continue.
A senior AI executive on your leadership team who owns the strategy, builds the agents and reports to your board. Typical engagement: 6–12 months.
The audit tells you which work is worth automating. Building it takes time you do not have, because the inbox and the calendar and the follow-ups are still yours. Most people add a Chief of Staff at that point, so the week stops eating the roadmap.
A dedicated AI assistant that runs your inbox, calendar, projects and follow-ups. Personal leverage in 48 hours.
Do the arithmetic on your own business, not on a headline. Take one workflow. Count the hours a month it consumes, multiply by the loaded cost of the people doing it, and multiply by twelve. That is the annual price of leaving it alone, and you pay it again next year, and the year after.
The harder part to see is the compounding. The competitor who starts this year doesn’t get a one-year head start. Their agents get better with every month of your industry’s data running through them. Their team gets fluent while yours is still evaluating. Their cost to serve keeps dropping while yours tracks payroll.
By the time the gap shows up on a P&L it is two or three years of accumulated advantage, and you are buying the capability late, at whatever the market charges for urgency.
The AI Leverage Score takes three minutes and tells you which of your workflows are worth automating first, and roughly what each one is costing you today. No call required.
A Fractional Chief AI Officer (CAIO) is a senior AI executive who leads your company's AI strategy on a part-time, retainer basis. They define your AI roadmap, identify high-leverage use cases, and oversee the design and deployment of custom AI agents, typically for $10,000 to $25,000 per month instead of the $400,000+ all-in cost of a full-time CAIO.
A fractional CAIO typically costs $10,000 to $25,000 per month, billed as a retainer. A full-time Chief AI Officer in the US averages $300,000 to $450,000 in base salary plus equity, benefits, and bonus, usually a fully-loaded cost of $450,000 to $700,000 per year. For most mid-market companies, a fractional engagement delivers the same strategic outcomes at 15 to 25 percent of the cost.
Chief Of Life is industry agnostic. We have engagements across professional services, healthcare, financial services, legal, real estate, e-commerce, and B2B SaaS. AI strategy fundamentals transfer; what differs is the data, the workflows, and the compliance posture. We adapt to all three.
Your data stays in your own environment, or in a dedicated tenant we stand up for you. It is never pooled with another client's. We do not train on your data. Agents are designed to pass your security review, and we will work to whatever controls your own compliance programme requires. If you have specific certification requirements, raise them on the strategy call and we will tell you plainly what we can and cannot meet.
Most engagements run 6 to 12 months. The first 30 days focus on strategy and roadmap, the next 60 days deliver an initial production agent, and months 4 through 12 expand the agent fleet and operationalize AI inside your team. Engagements are month-to-month with no long-term contracts.
Both. The fractional CAIO sets the strategy and owns the outcome. Our team of engineers and AI specialists builds the custom agents on the infrastructure we recommend. You get one accountable senior operator, not a vendor referral chain.
Roughly four hours in the first two weeks, access to the people who do the work so we can watch it happen, then about two hours a month. Building agents against a workflow nobody explained to us is how you end up in the 95%.
Then the roadmap says so and names it. Some workflows should be fixed with a process change or a $50 tool, not an agent. You get that in writing in the first 30 days, which is a cheaper way to find out than a year-long engagement.
Before anything is built, we agree the number: hours returned, cost per unit of work, cycle time, or revenue per employee. Every agent carries unit economics in dollars, reviewed quarterly. If one doesn't pay back, we sunset it and tell you why.
You own everything we build: the agents, the prompts, the evaluation framework, the runbooks. We hand off to your internal team, help you hire a full-time CAIO if that's the right next step, or stay on retainer at a reduced cadence for ongoing oversight.
Thirty minutes, no deck, no obligation. Bring the workflow that annoys you most and we'll tell you straight whether an agent should be doing it, and roughly what that's worth. If the answer is no, you'll hear that too.